viii) Testing and Evaluating
Page 1 of 1 • Share •
viii) Testing and Evaluating
Evaluation 1
Name: Jessica Mendoza
Date: 27th November
Please rate the site: (On a scale of 1 to 5. 5 being the highest, 1 being the lowest)
Ease of use: 5
Navigation: 4
Readability: 5
Design: 5
Information: 5
Support: 4
Evaluation:
Heyy! Nice website
I like the design and the colours. Its easy to read aswell. Lots of useful information. As an assignment task, I actually found it useful and actually gained something from it. I think more images and graphics could be used.
Evaluation 2:
Name: Jeffery Yuen
Date: 27th November
Please rate the site: (On a scale of 1 to 5. 5 being the highest, 1 being the lowest)
Ease of use: 4
Navigation: 5
Readability: 4
Design: 4
Information: 5
Support: 5
Evaluation:
I liked how the information you put there, and the images to go with the text helped make it more interesting. When i first opened to page, the design of the website and colour struck me first, it look heaps pro. The liked the youtube clip at the start aswell haha. The forum addition is good too.
Evaluation 3
Name: Phoebe Pulido
Date: 26th November
Please rate the site: (On a scale of 1 to 5. 5 being the highest, 1 being the lowest)
Ease of use: 4
Navigation: 5
Readability: 4
Design: 5
Information: 4
Support: 3
Evaluation:
The design was easy to navigate around and the design and use of colours was excellent...being a graphic artist myself
The only thing I could critisize on is possibly too much information and lack of support..things like a FAQ would be nice. Otherwise, great work!
Evaluation 4
Name: James Truong
Date: 27th November
Please rate the site: (On a scale of 1 to 5. 5 being the highest, 1 being the lowest)
Ease of use: 4
Navigation: 4
Readability: 5
Design: 5
Information: 5
Support: 5
Evaluation:
Nice design, easy to read (nice big letters), the colours are also great. That's what struck me first. I didnt quite get why there was a contents page when there was the topics on the side, but it was good anyway. Lots of useful information too, straight to the point, and you get what you need.
Evaluation 5
Name: Marie Reyes
Date: 27th November
Please rate the site: (On a scale of 1 to 5. 5 being the highest, 1 being the lowest)
Ease of use: 4
Navigation: 4
Readability: 5
Design: 5
Information: 4
Support: 5
Evaluation:
I think the information could've been a little shorter, like the types of software licenses part and more concise. The design elements of the page were well thought out though, great colours and contrast. The navigation was good, though i think you could've got rid of the contents page. Well done.
Name: Jessica Mendoza
Date: 27th November
Please rate the site: (On a scale of 1 to 5. 5 being the highest, 1 being the lowest)
Ease of use: 5
Navigation: 4
Readability: 5
Design: 5
Information: 5
Support: 4
Evaluation:
Heyy! Nice website
Evaluation 2:
Name: Jeffery Yuen
Date: 27th November
Please rate the site: (On a scale of 1 to 5. 5 being the highest, 1 being the lowest)
Ease of use: 4
Navigation: 5
Readability: 4
Design: 4
Information: 5
Support: 5
Evaluation:
I liked how the information you put there, and the images to go with the text helped make it more interesting. When i first opened to page, the design of the website and colour struck me first, it look heaps pro. The liked the youtube clip at the start aswell haha. The forum addition is good too.
Evaluation 3
Name: Phoebe Pulido
Date: 26th November
Please rate the site: (On a scale of 1 to 5. 5 being the highest, 1 being the lowest)
Ease of use: 4
Navigation: 5
Readability: 4
Design: 5
Information: 4
Support: 3
Evaluation:
The design was easy to navigate around and the design and use of colours was excellent...being a graphic artist myself
Evaluation 4
Name: James Truong
Date: 27th November
Please rate the site: (On a scale of 1 to 5. 5 being the highest, 1 being the lowest)
Ease of use: 4
Navigation: 4
Readability: 5
Design: 5
Information: 5
Support: 5
Evaluation:
Nice design, easy to read (nice big letters), the colours are also great. That's what struck me first. I didnt quite get why there was a contents page when there was the topics on the side, but it was good anyway. Lots of useful information too, straight to the point, and you get what you need.
Evaluation 5
Name: Marie Reyes
Date: 27th November
Please rate the site: (On a scale of 1 to 5. 5 being the highest, 1 being the lowest)
Ease of use: 4
Navigation: 4
Readability: 5
Design: 5
Information: 4
Support: 5
Evaluation:
I think the information could've been a little shorter, like the types of software licenses part and more concise. The design elements of the page were well thought out though, great colours and contrast. The navigation was good, though i think you could've got rid of the contents page. Well done.
hpulido- Admin
- Posts: 10
Join date: 2008-11-19

Permissions of this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Home


